Reports

SVET Reports

Evernomics: To Code Or Not To Code?

Evernomics embodies the idea of individuals ceasing to be minuscule components within the seemingly senseless and colossal resource-consuming/profit-generating entity we proudly refer to as “the World Economy.”

In essence, Evernomics asserts that all economic and business processes should serve the purpose of “Eternalization.” This involves continuously improving our adaptation to external environmental conditions and ultimately reinventing the Universe to prevent a Vacuum Decay Event. Simultaneously, to avoid the transformation of humans into mere extensions of AI (whatever that may entail), all economic processes must either be internalized or seamlessly integrated into our environment and, ultimately, into ourselves.

This is why Evernomics is also termed the “limitless economy.” It advocates for advancing along the path of technological progress without forsaking our inherent humanity, cognitive abilities, and social tendencies that emphasize a profound need for connection and cooperation.

The divergence from our humanity or the atomization of our civilization into self-sustained “Cosmic Individuals” could lead each of these individuals to self-stasis or self-acceleration, resulting in temporal distortion and eventually collapsing into the Singularity.

Nevertheless, the journey ahead is lengthy, and each individual possesses the freedom of will to choose a distinct path toward our ultimate destiny — Eternalization. This implies either amalgamating into the Ant House to sidestep the burden of decision-making by exploring multiple routes or decentralizing to nullify the isolating and excessive effects of individualism leading to a detachment from the perception of time.

Evernomics advocates for the latter, steering away from the Ant House as it is deemed unappealing and degrading to our intellect. However, to resolve the infinite array of individual differences, we require tools for arbitration. Mathematics or code emerges as the optimal choice, being both falsifiable/provable and incomprehensible, granting it a ‘divine’ status that can be embraced by the majority.

This is where the concept of a universal algorithmic consensus comes into play, facilitating the decentralization of the governance mechanism. Hence, Evernomics promotes the supremacy of code over “human decisions” in inter-civilizational arbitrage.